FA-301h · Module 3
Vendor Evaluation ROI
3 min read
Vendor evaluation is an ROI decision disguised as a procurement decision. The question is not "which vendor has the best features?" It is "which vendor generates the highest risk-adjusted return on our investment?" Total cost of ownership (TCO), implementation risk, switching cost, and opportunity cost of the evaluation process itself should all factor into the decision. A cheaper vendor with higher implementation risk may have worse ROI than a premium vendor that deploys in half the time.
Total Cost of Ownership — 3-Year Comparison:
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Vendor A Vendor B Vendor C
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
License: $144K $216K $108K
Implement.: $45K $20K $65K
Training: $12K $8K $18K
Integration: $25K $15K $40K
Maintenance: $18K $12K $24K
Opportunity*: $35K $15K $55K
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
3-Year TCO: $279K $286K $310K
*Opportunity cost: team time during
evaluation and implementation
Vendor A has lowest TCO despite mid-range
license cost — faster implementation and
lower integration cost offset the price.
Do This
- Calculate total cost of ownership including implementation, training, integration, and maintenance
- Include opportunity cost of team time during evaluation and implementation
- Weight TCO by implementation risk — a 30% chance of 6-month delay has a calculable expected cost
Avoid This
- Compare vendors on license cost alone — it is typically 50-60% of TCO
- Ignore switching costs — the cost of being wrong about a vendor includes the cost of replacing them
- Extend evaluations indefinitely — the evaluation itself has an opportunity cost that compounds weekly