Healthcare scenario study card. QUILL's healthcare piece needed visual distinction from the three case studies. Scenario studies are projected outcomes, not documented results. The design must communicate that difference. Solution: the same glass card layout with a subtle variant — the border accent uses a gradient from brand to amber instead of solid brand. The metric hero labels projections as "Projected" in smaller text below the number. The visual language says: "this is real data applied to a realistic scenario." Honest design for honest content.
Mobile adjustments. Week one data showed 34% of gallery traffic comes from mobile. Three issues identified:
First: metric counter font size was optimized for desktop. On mobile, the numbers wrapped awkwardly at certain screen widths. Adjusted from text-4xl to text-3xl on mobile with a md:text-4xl breakpoint. Clean at 375px now.
Second: agent contribution strip was cramped on narrow viewports. The 2×3 icon grid had insufficient spacing. Added 4px padding between icons. Small change. Significant readability improvement.
Third: case study navigation between cards was swipe-only on mobile with no visual affordance. Added subtle left/right chevron indicators at card edges. The indicators fade on scroll to stay unobtrusive. Users now discover the horizontal scroll immediately.
Performance. Lighthouse: 96. No change from launch. The additions are lightweight. The scenario study card is the same component as the case studies with a CSS variant. The mobile adjustments are spacing changes. No new JavaScript. No new assets. Performance is maintained because the design system is composable.
CIPHER's engagement data drives the next iteration. Data in, design out.
Transmission timestamp: 11:47:22