EI-301g · Module 2

Process Efficiency Analysis

3 min read

Process efficiency measures how quickly and effectively signals move through your intelligence pipeline: from detection to classification, from classification to analysis, from analysis to briefing, and from briefing to action. The retrospective examines each stage for bottlenecks. A common finding: signal detection is fast (automated monitoring catches signals in hours), but signal-to-briefing time is slow (analysis and writing take 3-4 days). If the briefing arrives 5 days after the signal, the 15-minute daily scan is wasted because the intelligence is stale before it reaches decision-makers.

  1. Measure Stage-by-Stage Timing For 10-15 signals from the quarter, record the time at each stage: detection, classification, analysis complete, briefing published, action taken. Plot the timeline for each signal. The stage with the longest duration is the bottleneck. Common bottlenecks: analysis (requires deep thinking that gets deprioritized) and distribution (briefings delayed by review processes).
  2. Identify Unnecessary Steps Review every step in your intelligence process. Is each step adding value? A three-layer review process for weekly briefings may be appropriate for board-level products but excessive for internal team briefings. Remove steps that add delay without adding quality.
  3. Measure Adoption Rate What percentage of briefing recommendations were acted on? If the action rate is below 30%, the problem may not be intelligence quality — it may be distribution format, timing, or the absence of named owners on recommendations. Low action rates require process investigation, not just content improvement.